suspicious puer


One of the intentionally aged teas, Pu-Erh has a loyal following.

suspicious puer

Postby yalokinh » Aug 26th, '13, 22:53

Saw this and hought it looked fishy, thoughts?
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.vi ... 0639341505
User avatar
yalokinh
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Feb 19th, '
Location: Florida, Minnesota

Re: suspicious puer

Postby Exempt » Aug 26th, '13, 22:56

Pass
Exempt
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Dec 9th, '1
Location: Seattle

Re: suspicious puer

Postby yalokinh » Aug 26th, '13, 23:09

Thought so
User avatar
yalokinh
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Feb 19th, '
Location: Florida, Minnesota

Re: suspicious puer

Postby yalokinh » Aug 26th, '13, 23:17

User avatar
yalokinh
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Feb 19th, '
Location: Florida, Minnesota

Re: suspicious puer

Postby Exempt » Aug 26th, '13, 23:59

I still wouldn't risk it. Anything with those weird, poorly written names that vaguely describe what you're getting instantly make those a no for me
Exempt
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Dec 9th, '1
Location: Seattle

Re: suspicious puer

Postby AllanK » Aug 27th, '13, 00:03

yalokinh wrote:Saw this and hought it looked fishy, thoughts?
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.vi ... 0639341505

That answers another question! I was in a Chinatown tea store today and bought that exact Puerh for a significantly higher price. I will see how it is tomorrow. I have no way to know if Sun's Organic Teas got theirs from the same place. I thought it too good to be true at some $25 or $30 bucks but I was there it was an impulse purchase. I figured I didn't have much to lose.
AllanK
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Jul 13th, '

Re: suspicious puer

Postby mr mopu » Aug 27th, '13, 06:55

AllanK wrote:
yalokinh wrote:Saw this and hought it looked fishy, thoughts?
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.vi ... 0639341505

That answers another question! I was in a Chinatown tea store today and bought that exact Puerh for a significantly higher price. I will see how it is tomorrow. I have no way to know if Sun's Organic Teas got theirs from the same place. I thought it too good to be true at some $25 or $30 bucks but I was there it was an impulse purchase. I figured I didn't have much to lose.

Definite no go on the first brick. The second I wouldn't risk it. If you are looking for reputable sellers from China let me know I have some good contacts over there.
mr mopu
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Feb 17th, '

Re: suspicious puer

Postby theredbaron » Aug 27th, '13, 08:04

Both bricks are rubbish. The first one is quite obviously a cheap Shu, the second for the claimed 12 years far too yellowish-green in color.

There are a bunch of those Hongkong based shops selling supposedly old teas for very cheap prices on ebay. I ordered once one, just to see, and had to gag at the first sip of the outrageously nasty brew.
theredbaron
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Aug 1st, '1
Location: Bangkok

Re: suspicious puer

Postby MarshalN » Aug 27th, '13, 10:22

The second brick is no older than 2005, because it's from the Changtai group, whereas before 2005 it was the Changtai teashop.
User avatar
MarshalN
 
Posts: 2099
Joined: Mar 15th, '

Re: suspicious puer

Postby AllanK » Aug 27th, '13, 11:23

theredbaron wrote:Both bricks are rubbish. The first one is quite obviously a cheap Shu, the second for the claimed 12 years far too yellowish-green in color.

There are a bunch of those Hongkong based shops selling supposedly old teas for very cheap prices on ebay. I ordered once one, just to see, and had to gag at the first sip of the outrageously nasty brew.


The woman who sold me the same brick as the first brick in this post has repeat customers and while I am sure it is inexpensive Puerh that she had a tremendous markup on I will see if it is any good tonight. It could be something produced in huge quantities that is still available in large quantities and thus not a $4 brick now worth $400, but a $4 brick now worth $13. It really depends on how it was stored, I guess. In any case, I was overcharged or she was. I have no way to know what she paid. She doesn't have a website, only a facebook page.
AllanK
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Jul 13th, '

Re: suspicious puer

Postby AllanK » Aug 28th, '13, 00:20

AllanK wrote:
yalokinh wrote:Saw this and hought it looked fishy, thoughts?
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.vi ... 0639341505

That answers another question! I was in a Chinatown tea store today and bought that exact Puerh for a significantly higher price. I will see how it is tomorrow. I have no way to know if Sun's Organic Teas got theirs from the same place. I thought it too good to be true at some $25 or $30 bucks but I was there it was an impulse purchase. I figured I didn't have much to lose.

I am drinking this Puerh now. The first steeping was decent with a fruity somewhat zesty aftertaste. The second steeping is not as good. It is a very dark and strong Puerh. I do not think I will steep it a third time. Had the second steeping been as good as the first I would have made the Ebay seller an offer on one of his bricks. It definitely was not worth what Sun's Organic Tea in Chinatown, NYC charged, but I did not know that at the time.
AllanK
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Jul 13th, '

Re: suspicious puer

Postby Evan Draper » Aug 28th, '13, 13:10


In one of those pictures, is that evidence of a neifei that has been torn off?
User avatar
Evan Draper
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Jan 23rd, '
Location: Philadelphia

Re: suspicious puer

Postby AllanK » Aug 28th, '13, 15:00

Evan Draper wrote:

In one of those pictures, is that evidence of a neifei that has been torn off?

What is a neifei?
AllanK
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Jul 13th, '

Re: suspicious puer

Postby Joel Byron » Aug 28th, '13, 19:36

A neifei is the small paper label that is pressed into the cake/brick/etc.
User avatar
Joel Byron
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Jan 19th, '


Instant Messenger

Permissions
You cannot post new topics
You cannot reply to topics
You cannot edit your posts
You cannot delete your posts
You cannot post attachments
Navigation