is this normal?

One of the intentionally aged teas, Pu-Erh has a loyal following.

Moderator: Emily@Adagio


is this normal?

Postby Smells_Familiar » Aug 31st, '08, 01:31

It's safe to say that I'm a newby when it comes to puerh. I've only got a handful of bricks and cakes but so far they have all come sealed in their own ways. I just recieved a few pieces and I've got some ?'s about them. This is a Mengku cake.
Image

It came unsealed like this. Is this normal for mengku cakes? Also, I received a few 100 gram bricks that actually weigh more like 85 grams or a bit less with the wrappers. Is this normal? I normally don't weigh my tea when I get it. I just happened to slap one on the scale because it looked so small, and yes, my scales are accurate. I know humidity can affect the weight of the tea, but this seems very light.

User avatar Smells_Familiar
Posts: 281
Joined: May 30, '08
Location: indianapolis

Postby Wesli » Aug 31st, '08, 01:58

Simple tissue wrapping is the norm.

User avatar Wesli
Posts: 1611
Joined: Jun 08, '07
Location: 3161 A.D.
Contact Wesli:

Postby Bert » Aug 31st, '08, 02:11

The unsealed wrapper is the most common way. Sealed wrapping shall be less likely faked, but who knows.

The 100 g bricks that weight actually 85 g are not ok in my opinion. Untill +/- 5 g is acceptable but 15 g is too much. If you got 5 bricks it means a loss of 75 g!
You should contact the vendor about that.

User avatar Bert
Posts: 40
Joined: May 24, '08
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Postby Trioxin » Aug 31st, '08, 03:46

I have a few of the newer Mengku cakes, and aside from the Mu Ye Chuns, they've all been sealed with a sticker. Which cake in particular are you asking about.

User avatar Trioxin
Posts: 627
Joined: Mar 04, '08
Location: Peoria, IL

Re: is this normal?

Postby heavydoom » Aug 31st, '08, 08:44

Smells_Familiar wrote:It's safe to say that I'm a newby when it comes to puerh. I've only got a handful of bricks and cakes but so far they have all come sealed in their own ways. I just recieved a few pieces and I've got some ?'s about them. This is a Mengku cake.
Image

It came unsealed like this. Is this normal for mengku cakes? Also, I received a few 100 gram bricks that actually weigh more like 85 grams or a bit less with the wrappers. Is this normal? I normally don't weigh my tea when I get it. I just happened to slap one on the scale because it looked so small, and yes, my scales are accurate. I know humidity can affect the weight of the tea, but this seems very light.


smelly,

is it this one?

http://cgi.ebay.ca/2006-Mengku-Lao-Ban- ... m153.l1262

since the photos did not show a wrapper, maybe it was just wrapped with that plain white paper. what about the paper stuck inside the cake?

User avatar heavydoom
Posts: 521
Joined: Jun 01, '08
Location: The Golden Horseshoe

Postby tony shlongini » Aug 31st, '08, 10:16

Somehow I doubt that a newbie would pick up a LBZ without knowing in advance exactly what it was.

I'd be leery about any unmarked tea unless it came from the most reputable of sources.

Your cake should have come with two pieces of paper inside the wrapper. The larger nèi piào will be loose, and the smaller nèi fēi will be partially pressed into the tea. This is the one to use for authentification, and perhaps someone here can recognize it if you post a pic.

User avatar tony shlongini
Posts: 529
Joined: Jul 23, '08
Location: The Isle of Malta

Postby heavydoom » Aug 31st, '08, 10:22

we need more pics of the front of the cake itself, back and front.

User avatar heavydoom
Posts: 521
Joined: Jun 01, '08
Location: The Golden Horseshoe

Postby silverneedles » Aug 31st, '08, 19:20

is the cake "weight" the amount of raw leaf they put in at the beginning? or at the end of processing(pressing +/- fermentation)

User avatar silverneedles
Posts: 558
Joined: Feb 27, '08
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: TX <- NY
Contact silverneedles:

Postby shogun89 » Aug 31st, '08, 19:36

silverneedles wrote:is the cake "weight" the amount of raw leaf they put in at the beginning? or at the end of processing(pressing +/- fermentation)


Its once the cake is packaged. (after pressing and drying).

User avatar shogun89
Posts: 1636
Joined: Feb 15, '08
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Salsero » Aug 31st, '08, 22:41

I weighed a a few of my cakes and bricks after reading this. It seems that my small sizes (100 gr) are more likely (in every case actually) to be under than my big cakes and bricks.

I have always avoided checking weight because I figured it would just upset me, but the opposite seems to be the case. Even fully dried the 357 gr to 500 gr cakes weigh their stated amount or more. They must have weighed considerably more just after manufacture and before drying.

User avatar Salsero
Posts: 5214
Joined: Dec 20, '06
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Gainesville, Florida

Postby shogun89 » Aug 31st, '08, 23:56

My bai cha tang cake I just received was the only one I ever weighed and it was 386 grams. (stated 400 gram cake) Thats fine with me. Could you imagine how hard it would be to get the exact amount. I think it is very rare. You would probably most likely see it in a blend IMO.

User avatar shogun89
Posts: 1636
Joined: Feb 15, '08
Location: Pennsylvania

shortchange on weight?

Postby Jim Liu » Sep 1st, '08, 00:36

The weight of a Puerh tea product is weighed at the time when maocha is compressed into a cake/brick/tuo.

The accuracy of the scaler, the dryness of maocha and other factors all contribute to the finished product.

I used to have a golden mellon labelled as 1kg but the actual weight is less than 870g. Should I be pissed by the shortchange?

Believe it or not, the human body has 70% H2O.

User avatar Jim Liu
Posts: 67
Joined: Oct 01, '06
Location: Indianapolis
Contact Jim Liu:

Re: shortchange on weight?

Postby Wesli » Sep 1st, '08, 01:09

puerhshop wrote:Believe it or not, the human body has 70% H2O.

With the amount of tea I drink... It's more like 99.99%

User avatar Wesli
Posts: 1611
Joined: Jun 08, '07
Location: 3161 A.D.
Contact Wesli:

Re: shortchange on weight?

Postby Bert » Sep 1st, '08, 01:38

puerhshop wrote:I used to have a golden mellon labelled as 1kg but the actual weight is less than 870g. Should I be pissed by the shortchange?


I would! (130g!)

User avatar Bert
Posts: 40
Joined: May 24, '08
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: shortchange on weight?

Postby shogun89 » Sep 1st, '08, 09:33

Bert wrote:
puerhshop wrote:I used to have a golden mellon labelled as 1kg but the actual weight is less than 870g. Should I be pissed by the shortchange?


I would! (130g!)


Yeah me too!

User avatar shogun89
Posts: 1636
Joined: Feb 15, '08
Location: Pennsylvania


Today's Poll



Community

In total there are 2 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest