Feb 3rd, '09, 16:55
Posts: 330
Joined: Feb 27th, '08, 11:03
Location: Portland, OR
by Dizzwave » Feb 3rd, '09, 16:55
you could be right, especially if there's moisture in the cake. Maybe freezing the paper itself would suffice.
Feb 3rd, '09, 17:10
Posts: 1633
Joined: Feb 15th, '08, 10:15
Location: Pennsylvania
Been thanked: 1 time
by shogun89 » Feb 3rd, '09, 17:10
Dizzwave wrote:you could be right, especially if there's moisture in the cake. Maybe freezing the paper itself would suffice.
that sounds fine, but yeah, freezing the cake sounds like a biiiiig NO NO. I may be wrong but. . . . .
Feb 3rd, '09, 17:13
Posts: 688
Joined: Jul 7th, '08, 19:06
Location: ostensible universe
by puerhking » Feb 3rd, '09, 17:13
if you have checked your cakes and they seem fine I would just check them again in a week.
Feb 3rd, '09, 17:16
Posts: 1633
Joined: Feb 15th, '08, 10:15
Location: Pennsylvania
Been thanked: 1 time
by shogun89 » Feb 3rd, '09, 17:16
puerhking wrote:if you have checked your cakes and they seem fine I would just check them again in a week.
I agree with that. If there is no harm then I see no need for action.