It's not easy being English.nada wrote:I drank this thousands of times before discovering Puerh. It didn't prepare me in the slightest!

It's not easy being English.nada wrote:I drank this thousands of times before discovering Puerh. It didn't prepare me in the slightest!
Funny, but I thought the other numbers were skewed.AdamMY wrote:I got that, but skewing the numbers that much, is like asking, who would you trust in their judgment of a teas merits... Someone who has had one tea a week for two years, or someone whose had a tea a day for a year?Tead Off wrote:The arithmetic was not the point. The broadened experience was the point. People need a basis for making choices. The only way you develop this is through experience, varied experience. In this way, you have a database from which decisions are drawn from. This is the way the brain works.AdamMY wrote:He fails at arithmetic if he was only supposed to drink tea 1000 times.Tead Off wrote:How about the man who has drunk 50 teas 100 times?the_economist wrote:I like elements of Shah's arguments. I fear the man who has drunk the same tea 1000 times much more than the man who has drunk 1000 teas just once.
When you change the total number of teas by that much you throw off the comparison in an uneven fashion. But to fix it for you but still get what you are going for, we could ask: "What about someone who has had 50 teas 20 times each?"
That was my point. Thinking hard about a single tea, trying to get the best out of it, learning everything about it, can prepare you for the sampling. Otherwise, much of the sampling can be wasted.debunix wrote:I did something pretty close to the 1 tea, 1000 times--I was drinking only two teas, always the same version from the same brand, for many years, before I suddenly started drinking a lot of different teas. The years of limited tea varieties did prepare me to recognize the differences when I broadened my tea horizons, but it was sampling a wide variety of teas that really got it going.
Tecnorobo wrote:And, if people don't do it around here already, maybe we can trade some tea sometime?
The costly 20+ years old tea is still worth the price IMHO, maybe just a piece for reference and education, but the problem is 99.99% of it are fakes or badly stored genuine ones.ChengduCha wrote: Unless you fall for the costly 20+ years aged stuff it's a very inexpensive habbit.
Lovely quote, worth repeating!Teaism wrote:Believe me that if one have tried a real old genuine sheng pu which has been properly stored and brewed, the person will be very likely to literally kneel down and beg the collector to sell it.ChengduCha wrote: Unless you fall for the costly 20+ years aged stuff it's a very inexpensive habbit.
This is how one become a tea junky.BioHorn wrote:Lovely quote, worth repeating!Teaism wrote:Believe me that if one have tried a real old genuine sheng pu which has been properly stored and brewed, the person will be very likely to literally kneel down and beg the collector to sell it.ChengduCha wrote: Unless you fall for the costly 20+ years aged stuff it's a very inexpensive habbit.