User avatar
Jul 28th, '10, 12:59
Posts: 763
Joined: Jun 7th, '08, 11:47

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by britt » Jul 28th, '10, 12:59

JBaymore wrote: (Even the Yakuza have their own code of proper behavior.)
Like four fingers per hand?

I don't know that much about them, but they seem to have a very rigid and highly-enforced code. They can also have some truly original ideas when compared to their western counterparts. A while back I watched a documentary on the Yakuza in California and Hawaii. Even in the Yakuza, the unique Japanese way is evident. Instead of looking for an existing resort and taking it over, they picked a suitable site then contacted hotels, casinos, etc. and told them to build and open new branches of their businesses at the new location chosen by the Yakuza. Apparently none declined to do so.

User avatar
Jul 28th, '10, 14:53
Posts: 352
Joined: May 18th, '09, 09:49

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by Robert Fornell » Jul 28th, '10, 14:53

JBaymore wrote:Robert,

Good to see you sharing your thoughts here too.

Hey Robert.... you want to go into business together? Maybe some Matsuzaki Ken stuff? Think we could pull off Suzuki Goro? Ah.... Koie Ryouji! That's the ticket. No wait...... Hamada Tomoo...I do overglaze enamels and have Mashiko Stone. :lol: :lol: :lol: (TOTALLY kidding folks, kidding.)

ronin ceramurai wrote:Looking at JB's previous 2 posts in the light of cross cultural communications (ibunka)....... Linguistic differences, differences in fluency levels, differences in communication style ie. direct vs. indirect, as well as basic cultural differences. When all these come together on an international venue like Ebay, things can happen.
Yup....... difficult communications at best. My guess is that in typical Japanese fashion, he answered my question already, really. If I were in Japan dealing in person.... I'd know that from voice inflection and maybe the "sucking teeth sound" that might have been there..... and with the clear avoidance of the direct answer to the question asked. As I mentioned already..... "simple boxes" is the indirect answer. There to see, if you are listening.


ronin ceramurai wrote:I think the seller probably bought works from this potter at a discount, in bulk, or off Yahoo Japan Auctions as there is a lot of work on that site at deeply discounted prices. He signed or had boxes signed to add value. Deceitful yes. Uncommon, no.
Most of the Seigan and Deshi stuff that I have seen on EBay and the various "one stop shopping" type tea/teaware online vendors is, as best as I can tell from looking at them, "kiln" production work or lower end artist's pieces. So I think you are correct about the sourcing of most of this stuff. The potters tend to reserve the beter items for exhibitions and the gallery type dealers, with higher prices.

I think the depressed lower to mid level economy in Japan combined with the younger generation's tendency toward a lack of interest in more traditional culture and pursuits has caused many potters there to look to the internet for moving some lower priced works outside the internal Japanese economy.

Who knows.

Even with all the "benefit of the doubts" thrown in,.... this guy smells a bit fishy.

best,

.............john



Hey John,

Let's do it! While I'm not focused that much on Mashiko, I'm pretty sure I could do Koie Ryouji or Tsujimura Shiro justice.... I'd settle for 250,000 yen ($2,800) per chawan which is about 1/2 the going rate :lol: :lol: :lol:

My Miwa Jyusetsu knock offs would land me in a bit of trouble however... :(
cha 2ff.jpg
cha 2ff.jpg (19.58 KiB) Viewed 1175 times
Yup....... difficult communications at best. My guess is that in typical Japanese fashion, he answered my question already, really. If I were in Japan dealing in person.... I'd know that from voice inflection and maybe the "sucking teeth sound" that might have been there..... and with the clear avoidance of the direct answer to the question asked. As I mentioned already..... "simple boxes" is the indirect answer. There to see, if you are listening.
That is if you know what to listen for/can "decode" what your hearing. :?
Most of the Seigan and Deshi stuff that I have seen on EBay and the various "one stop shopping" type tea/teaware online vendors is, as best as I can tell from looking at them, "kiln" production work or lower end artist's pieces. So I think you are correct about the sourcing of most of this stuff. The potters tend to reserve the beter items for exhibitions and the gallery type dealers, with higher prices.

I think the depressed lower to mid level economy in Japan combined with the younger generation's tendency toward a lack of interest in more traditional culture and pursuits has caused many potters there to look to the internet for moving some lower priced works outside the internal Japanese economy.
While in Hagi, as I usually go to galleries such as Saitoan or workshops to view pots ie. Hatano Zenzo, Okada Yu, Hamanaka Gesson, I don't see much work done by either of them. Ebay, Yahoo Japan Auctions and the various online galleries are about the only places I've seen these folks work at and yes it does appear to be "kiln" work..... which isn't to say it is not good work for daily use. How "collectable it is in terms of appreciation is uncertain however.....

I hear that even work by well known Tsujimura Shiro is falling in value these days due to the fact that the market is flooded with his pots as he doesn't destroy any work after it's fired..... Once the market is saturated prices will fall.

Back to buy the pots not the potter.

Perceptive comments about traditional culture in Japan as well JB as earlier this month went I was there meeting folks I often heard that teaware sales are slow now due to the lack of interest with the younger generation. There is however a movement similar to "Seekernoyu" with younger folks enjoying macha and it's related teaware outside of formal settings in their own individual way. Lower end chawan $300 - $800 sell well into this demographic.

Best,
R

User avatar
Jul 28th, '10, 16:12
Posts: 2625
Joined: May 31st, '08, 02:44
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Portland, OR
Contact: Geekgirl

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by Geekgirl » Jul 28th, '10, 16:12

Don't have anything salient to add, but wanted to comment that this has turned out to be a fascinating thread, thanks all!

User avatar
Jul 28th, '10, 16:45
Posts: 1076
Joined: Oct 6th, '09, 08:08
Location: France
Contact: David R.

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by David R. » Jul 28th, '10, 16:45

Interest of the new japanese generation in traditional arts such as tea or teaware is a big subject and certainly a big concern for the older generation.

A lot of young people are drifting away from the traditional path. It looks understandable for us cause it seems quite rigid and leaves very little space for individuality, which is kind of the opposite of the western way.

Anyway, this plus the economical crisis makes it difficult for traditional arts to live, and it does not look good for the future either.

Thank god we are here to finance the teaware arts. :)

++

User avatar
Jul 29th, '10, 14:52
Posts: 763
Joined: Jun 7th, '08, 11:47

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by britt » Jul 29th, '10, 14:52

David R. wrote:Interest of the new japanese generation in traditional arts such as tea or teaware is a big subject and certainly a big concern for the older generation.

A lot of young people are drifting away from the traditional path. It looks understandable for us cause it seems quite rigid and leaves very little space for individuality, which is kind of the opposite of the western way.

Anyway, this plus the economical crisis makes it difficult for traditional arts to live, and it does not look good for the future either.

Thank god we are here to finance the teaware arts. :)

++
One of the reasons I've purchased so much Japanese teaware is that I don't know how long I'll be able to do so. I do fear for the survival of these arts, and even if they do survive, the dollar drop may well continue making these items prohibitively expensive. At least these are the excuses I use to justify purchasing that new matcha chawan or kyusu! Unfortunately, I think there's also much truth in them.

User avatar
Jul 29th, '10, 15:32
Posts: 404
Joined: Feb 24th, '09, 12:01
Scrolling: scrolling

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by rdl » Jul 29th, '10, 15:32

i think the consensus about the boxes chip received is that of disapproval, however one wants to view the seller.
but it brought up many interesting posts about collecting tea ware and perceptions and expectations, both objective and subjective.
this new topic i find very interesting. simply put: why do we buy what we buy? and what is it we buy? clay made beautiful or a whole package of perceptions? not that this hasn't been addressed before, but the replies here tie in the teaware, artist, box, the level of quality of the piece, who is selling it, the purpose (to use or as collectable). and how the perception changes if some fact about the tea ware changes. for example, the tea ware is authentic but the box is not. or the piece thought to be a high quality piece is found to be a production piece. how would that alter a tea ware if that situation occured to you?
there are too many possibilities to list but i would like to hear the different thoughts out there.
i think collecting goes beyond just the aesthetic factor, although that may be a major factor. but the posts have brought out these other factors that add nuance to collecting and appreciating tea ware.

User avatar
Jul 29th, '10, 21:47
Posts: 1574
Joined: Dec 30th, '08, 21:16
Location: The foot of the great Smoky Mountains

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by iannon » Jul 29th, '10, 21:47

I havent really chimed in previously and I am no pro at Japanese Teaware by any stretch of the imagination. But...for me the teaware is more a vessel to enhance the experience I have with my Tea. Thats putting it a bit simply..perhaps rather my Teaware enhances my overall experience/time with my Tea sessions/rituals.
Doesnt mean i wouldnt be upset when I pay for something sold to me as one thing and its not though.
I dont really "collect" teaware as the real collectible stuff is really outside of my normal budget. I do gather few pieces that i will enjoy using on a day to day basis to drink my Tea with.
Last edited by iannon on Jul 30th, '10, 02:30, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jul 30th, '10, 00:56
Posts: 4536
Joined: Apr 1st, '09, 00:48
Location: Bangkok

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by Tead Off » Jul 30th, '10, 00:56

Buying from photos can never duplicate the experience of hands-on evalutation. You open yourself to every kind of possibility, both good and bad, when you buy from photos.

Having said that, when one has experience with an artist that you know, or, you've made enough mistakes buying teaware that just sits on your shelves collecting dust, hopefully, you've refined your eye and taste enough to know what to expect when you see a photo of something. But, you will never know how a thing feels and functions from a photo, and, for me, this is one of the essential requirements for me. Caveat Emptor, buyer beware, is screaming to be heard on places like ebay. Be happy with less. Don't be compulsive. Spend wisely. Best thing is to visit potters or pottery fairs. Handle things, observe forms, glazes, weights, etc. You can never go wrong buying what you like, but, what you like might change, then what to do? Ebay? :lol:

User avatar
Jul 30th, '10, 11:54
Posts: 1796
Joined: Sep 15th, '09, 16:11
Location: Wilton, New Hampshire USA
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by JBaymore » Jul 30th, '10, 11:54

ronin ceramurai wrote:I hear that even work by well known Tsujimura Shiro is falling in value these days due to the fact that the market is flooded with his pots as he doesn't destroy any work after it's fired..... Once the market is saturated prices will fall.
Want to share a little story here.......

My first time in Japan many years ago, I was visiting a Japanese potter whom a friend (expatriate Amerikajin) had introduced me to. Not a "big name" Japanese... but does well. In his 60's. This gentleman was showing me and explaining to me about his chawan. At one point he talked about how few of these pieces he produced in a year.

Now I had studied Japanese ceramics, history, culture, and language and such from "afar" for a LONG time at that point in time. Thought I knew a thing or two :roll: . So little ole' naieve me is expecting this venerable potter to talk about unbelieveable aesthetic standards as the driving problem in this situation (they certainly were nice chawan) .... when he simply tells me " If I make and sell too many, the price drops."

THAT was one of the earliest of many, many, MANY subsequent important blinding "flash of the obvious" learning points that happened to me in Japan over the years. In that instant, I realized the nature of the pottery business in Japan is VERY different from the pottery business in the USA and that the "romantic" blinders that usually are firmly in place for American potters when it comes to Japanese ceramics are just that.... blinders.

It is not that his sole driving concept was money.......it certainly was not by any means........ but I understood that these Japanese potters were frequently skilled and shrewd businessmen in a land where pottery commanded a place in society where it could be treated as a significant business.

What I really learned that day was that despite decades of "abstract" study..........I didn't know diddly about Japanese ceramics :wink: .

I still don't really... but I am actively trying.

best,

..............john
Last edited by JBaymore on Jul 30th, '10, 13:25, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jul 30th, '10, 11:58
Posts: 1796
Joined: Sep 15th, '09, 16:11
Location: Wilton, New Hampshire USA
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by JBaymore » Jul 30th, '10, 11:58

britt wrote:
JBaymore wrote: (Even the Yakuza have their own code of proper behavior.)
Like four fingers per hand?
:lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Jul 30th, '10, 12:35
Posts: 404
Joined: Feb 24th, '09, 12:01
Scrolling: scrolling

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by rdl » Jul 30th, '10, 12:35

JBaymore wrote: It is not that his sole driving concept was money.......it certainly was not by any means........ but I understood that these Japanese potters were frequently skilled and shrewd businessmen in a land where pottery commanded a place in society what it could be treated as a significant business.
john,
your story is still a teaching moment for us after all these years. thank you for that.
i had an interesting comment from the spouse of a japanese potter while visiting the kiln. "if only we could sell a few of the best chawan...that would really help." quoted from memory but it shows that the business of pottery probably begins in the home.

User avatar
Jul 30th, '10, 18:01
Posts: 763
Joined: Jun 7th, '08, 11:47

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by britt » Jul 30th, '10, 18:01

rdl wrote:i think the consensus about the boxes chip received is that of disapproval, however one wants to view the seller.
but it brought up many interesting posts about collecting tea ware and perceptions and expectations, both objective and subjective.
this new topic i find very interesting. simply put: why do we buy what we buy? and what is it we buy? clay made beautiful or a whole package of perceptions? not that this hasn't been addressed before, but the replies here tie in the teaware, artist, box, the level of quality of the piece, who is selling it, the purpose (to use or as collectable). and how the perception changes if some fact about the tea ware changes. for example, the tea ware is authentic but the box is not. or the piece thought to be a high quality piece is found to be a production piece. how would that alter a tea ware if that situation occured to you?
there are too many possibilities to list but i would like to hear the different thoughts out there.
i think collecting goes beyond just the aesthetic factor, although that may be a major factor. but the posts have brought out these other factors that add nuance to collecting and appreciating tea ware.
I own so much teaware I can't say I don't collect, however, there's nothing I've purchased, regardless of artist or price, that I haven't used. Nothing is purchased specifically for display. I have recently packed up and stored about 40% of my tea and sake ware mainly because I ran out of cabinet space. All of these were used but some I've got tired of so may never use again. These items are still very decent, high-quality items so often if I doubt I'll use them again, and they're nothing I will miss, I give them away. The rest will probably be rotated in and out of storage every so often.

When I started drinking tea regularly about 3 years ago, I just threw the leaves in a cup. I was drinking it not as a hobby and not particularly for enjoyment, but more because it was better for us than Coke or Pepsi. When I graduated to high-quality tea, my interest in teaware greatly increased. I found that carefully chosen teaware (or sakeware, tableware, beer glasses, etc.) greatly enhanced my enjoyment. Since I was drinking so much tea, I might as well turn it into the most enjoyable experience I can.

I agree that until we use something, we can't really judge it. Some of the items I disliked the most when I first received them have become my favorites. One Japanese vendor of matcha chawan was extremely pleased when he found out I actuallyt use all the chawans I purchased from him. He said most of his customers put them on a shelf and never use them. He asked for a picture of my chawan shelf, but I don't have one. I keep them in a cabinet so they won't get knocked off. It would be nice to display some of them, but to me it's more important to actually use them.

To clarify, I would not give my niece a Koji Kamada teacup to drink from as it would likely get broken. I would use these myself or with an adult who understands the value of these items. Any other guest would be served in lesser tea and sake ware. The last thing I'd want is a toast by drunken guests with my Koji Kamada Tenmoku sakazuki; could be a very expensive toast!

I use Chinese and Taiwanese teaware interchangeably for tea from those countries. I use Japanese teaware for Japanese tea. That's just my preference. Although some of the American-made pottery seen on this site looks great, I've never bought any. Again, that's just my personal choice to keep the tea and teaware from the same country.

As for the teaware, box, overall quality issues I usually only purchase from known, reliable vendors. Buying direct from Japan and real Japanese sellers has really elimminated any problems with quality. I am much more careful when looking for vendors of Chinese teaware. I have found two great mainland vendors, but so far I'm lucky.

Another quality issue I have noticed is that for example, a Kushan yunomi from one vendor is 1/3 to 1/2 the price of the same artist's work sold by another vendor. Seems like a good deal to many, but a closer look usually reveals there's a reason for the lower price. There's nothing wrong with the lower-priced product, but it's not of the same overall quality as the higher-priced one. It is a good deal for someone who doesn't want to pay for an exhibition piece. I personally prefer to pay the higher price for the better piece. Even if I don't fully appreciate the difference now, I may later.

If there's any advice I'd give to a newcomer, it would be about the money I've wasted with this hobby by not buying higher quality items from the start. "Buy less, but buy better quality to begin with." Buying many moderately priced items can quickly add up to the price of a superior, much more expensive item that will hold it's value better and may also be more enjoyable to use. Just don't drop it!

User avatar
Jul 31st, '10, 11:54
Posts: 1796
Joined: Sep 15th, '09, 16:11
Location: Wilton, New Hampshire USA
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by JBaymore » Jul 31st, '10, 11:54

OK... I got a response yesterday from the guy in response to my second repeated question about if Seigan signed the box on the pot I was questioning about (the $160 buy-it-now one).

He said yes...... no hedging...except for the possible typo there. I quote him here, under the terms of "Fair Use": "Master Sagabn wrote the box."

He also added that the work in question was for the European market and that "the seal" was not for "normal works".

He did not elaborate on his use of the terrm "the seal". Whether that means the hanko on the box, the kiln signature stamp on the piece, or both was totally unclear.

So he is responding to ME.... a potential buyer... but apparently not to Chip...... a dissatisfied paying customer. Says a lot.

best,

.............john

User avatar
Jul 31st, '10, 13:06
Posts: 20891
Joined: Apr 22nd, '06, 20:52
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Back in the TeaCave atop Mt. Fuji
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by Chip » Jul 31st, '10, 13:06

JBaymore wrote:So he is responding to ME.... a potential buyer... but apparently not to Chip...... a dissatisfied paying customer. Says a lot.
Indeed it does. I do not buy it. I did not want to convolute the issue here, but I caught him in another lie previously unrelated to this issue.

Plus I received pieces from 2 different artisans from this seller with this same order, same deal, both artisans were badly smeared and still extremely smearable. What are the odds of this? Considering I have never ever seen a box in this condition before ...

I simply cannot imagine an artisan doing this to a box containing his/her works!!! And from Japanese artisan??? Say it isn't so ...

User avatar
Aug 22nd, '10, 18:08
Posts: 106
Joined: May 19th, '10, 05:42

Re: Hagi, presented for your disapproval

by Chesslover » Aug 22nd, '10, 18:08

I also ordered from this ebay seller and must confirm Chip's findings...the writting on the box is smeared...but I kind of expected that. What is worse - the size in the bid and actual size don't match. In the bid it said 9,4 cm wide. And I received cup 6 cm wide. It's no use to me, because it holds less than 100 ml and I wanted (and expected) it to hold around 150 ml...

I'm so sad...they don't accept returns...what can I do?

+ Post Reply