Tea Wiki

TeaChat regulars' private forum.


User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 14:59
Posts: 2299
Joined: Oct 23rd, '06, 19:46
Location: Seattle Area
Contact: tenuki

by tenuki » Feb 11th, '08, 14:59

Salsero wrote:Mapping sounds like something to check with BHale or Scruff to make sure you admin types are not working at cross purposes.
I wasn't talking about site mapping, just about creating a map of taiwan with the tea regions labeled.
Do something different, something different will happen. ( Gong Fu Garden )

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 15:37
Posts: 5151
Joined: Dec 20th, '06, 23:33
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Been thanked: 1 time

by Salsero » Feb 11th, '08, 15:37

tenuki wrote:I wasn't talking about site mapping, just about creating a map of taiwan with the tea regions labeled.
:oops:
You mean people are still using that kind of map too? LMAO :lol:

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 16:32
Posts: 1598
Joined: Jan 11th, '07, 16:13
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

by scruffmcgruff » Feb 11th, '08, 16:32

Salsero wrote:I'm wondering if it would be a big mistake to approach vendors like Stephane at Tea Masters or Ankit of Lochan Teas to contribute? I could imagine that becoming a big nightmare.

There's enormous talent and knowledge at RFDT and Cha Dao, people like Lew Perin (who runs BabelCarp), Corax, Geraldo, and several others who have been tea snobs for many years. Seems we should be able to tap into that somehow without letting too many idiots get their hands on things.
Salsero, I think we have to use our best judgment with regard to vendors. On one hand, as bearsbearsbears has mentioned, having someone like Imen write the section on Dan Cong would be of incredible value. On the other hand, I definitely see the potential dangers of letting potentially less scrupulous vendors make contributions. Fortunately, there are a number of us users who could intervene if we see non-neutral edits being made.

Also, I posted on RFDT a little while back, but have gotten no feedback on my post. Perhaps if you backed it, it would seem more credible? I feel your name is more well known than mine in that group. I also think posting on the puerh LJ and sending missives out to the other guys you mentioned would be great.
Tea Nerd - www.teanerd.com

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 17:28
Posts: 5151
Joined: Dec 20th, '06, 23:33
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Been thanked: 1 time

by Salsero » Feb 11th, '08, 17:28

Maybe these guys are just too busy. I don't think my name is any better known, but 2 posts is better than one -- if we really want to extend a mass invitation.

There's certainly plenty of idiots over there in addition to the luminaries, so I am a little worried about attracting the wrong people. Maybe private messages would be the way to go. If so, either BBB or Hobbes would be the better ones to extend the invitation.

If we can get enough rough material up and a logical structure (and it is coming along nicely), it will help make it googleable and perhaps present a more tempting structure for experts to fiddle with.

Imen is a sweet lady, but I'm a little worried about her grasp of English. Frankly, there are plenty of times when I have no idea what she said in a post.

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 17:32
Posts: 452
Joined: Jun 15th, '06, 13:04
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

by bearsbearsbears » Feb 11th, '08, 17:32

Scruff McGruff wrote:
{snip}On one hand, as bearsbearsbears has mentioned, having someone like Imen write the section on Dan Cong would be of incredible value. On the other hand, I definitely see the potential dangers of letting potentially less scrupulous vendors make contributions.
I asked Imen on Saturday at her New Year's tea fête, and she seemed interested. She called my stub article an "Imen Trap". :) I'll follow up with her this week.

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 17:35
Posts: 5151
Joined: Dec 20th, '06, 23:33
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Been thanked: 1 time

by Salsero » Feb 11th, '08, 17:35

Well, if Bears is following with his native-speaker red pen, it should be a bang up article.

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 17:37
Posts: 20891
Joined: Apr 22nd, '06, 20:52
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Back in the TeaCave atop Mt. Fuji
Been thanked: 2 times

by Chip » Feb 11th, '08, 17:37

Perhaps a joint effort with Imen if she is aggreable to that. She could submit her text and one of you could make it more readable.
blah blah blah SENCHA blah blah blah!!!

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 18:11
Posts: 1598
Joined: Jan 11th, '07, 16:13
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

by scruffmcgruff » Feb 11th, '08, 18:11

I wrote:...potential dangers of letting potentially less...
Oops!
Tea Nerd - www.teanerd.com

User avatar
Feb 11th, '08, 21:34
Posts: 1459
Joined: Dec 20th, '06, 15:10

by Mary R » Feb 11th, '08, 21:34

Scruff McGruff wrote:Salsero, I think we have to use our best judgment with regard to vendors. On one hand, as bearsbearsbears has mentioned, having someone like Imen write the section on Dan Cong would be of incredible value. On the other hand, I definitely see the potential dangers of letting potentially less scrupulous vendors make contributions. Fortunately, there are a number of us users who could intervene if we see non-neutral edits being made.
Okay, I've got to fess up...I e-mailed Xine awhile back ago telling her about the wiki and asking if she or anyone at Adagio might be able to help flesh out the Adagio vendor page. I figured it would be a good idea...after all, it's not like we know the inner details or whatnot. They haven't yet, as you can see, but Xine and I have chatted about it once or twice since then.

Just letting you know...

User avatar
Feb 12th, '08, 13:09
Posts: 452
Joined: Jun 15th, '06, 13:04
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

by bearsbearsbears » Feb 12th, '08, 13:09

Chip wrote:Perhaps a joint effort with Imen if she is aggreable to that. She could submit her text and one of you could make it more readable.
it's an open edit process. i'm sure she'd be amenable.

Locked