I see on some places that they're selling 2006 and 2007 Li-shan (is that right? Doesn't look right since I typed it). Anyway, do they get better with age?
Trying to learn...

EW
Yes, but they have to be prepared for aging properly, sometimes up/down roasted for _months_ prior to storage and also stored in an airtight container usually (there are a few exceptions).omegapd wrote:Oolong ignorant here...
I see on some places that they're selling 2006 and 2007 Li-shan (is that right? Doesn't look right since I typed it). Anyway, do they get better with age?
Trying to learn...![]()
EW
There is a difference between old oolong and properly aged oolong. Maybe some do get better when they get old, but the aged oolongs go through a very specific process. Some of the teas you mentioned look like they may just be leftover teas the vendor wasn't able to sell. This doesn't necessarily make them bad, in fact they may be very good, but they're not the same as the intentionally aged oolongs.omegapd wrote:Oolong ignorant here...
I see on some places that they're selling 2006 and 2007 Li-shan (is that right? Doesn't look right since I typed it). Anyway, do they get better with age?
Trying to learn...![]()
EW
That's not really true. While today many people try to prepare oolong for storage via roasting, much aged oolong on the market never underwent supplemental roastings before, during, or after storage, and most of the aged oolong on the market today was incidentally aged; it didn't sell but was too valuable to toss out.tenuki wrote: Yes, but they have to be prepared for aging properly, sometimes up/down roasted for _months_ prior to storage and also stored in an airtight container usually (there are a few exceptions).
that is why I said 'sometimes'.bearsbearsbears wrote:That's not really true. While today many people try to prepare oolong for storage via roasting, much aged oolong on the market never underwent supplemental roastings before, during, or after storage, and most of the aged oolong on the market today was incidentally aged; it didn't sell but was too valuable to toss out.tenuki wrote: Yes, but they have to be prepared for aging properly, sometimes up/down roasted for _months_ prior to storage and also stored in an airtight container usually (there are a few exceptions).
See Lawrence's (marshaln's) blog for more info from someone who experienced purchasing and tasting aged oolongs in Taiwan first-hand.
If by general consensus you mean vendor consensus, then yes.tenuki wrote: However, I think the general consensus is that what I describe increases the chances that it will age well, right?
There isn't much of a "tradition" of aging oolongs. Roastings and storage conditions were shopkeeper experimentations after they were confronted with unsold volumes of tea. Each shop has a different approach on keeping oolongs: whether to roast them, how to roast them, how to store them. Shop owners generally aren't master tea roasters, and procedures vary from shop to shop. There's no traditional knowledge regarding roasting and storage. There's simply no consensus.tenuki wrote:From what I understand aging processing has traditionally been a household knowledge sort of thing and isn't 'recent' really.
that's what I meant by household knowledge, ie each household/shop had their own 'formula/process'. We are saying the same thing bears. Each shop has a tradition/approach, that would be traditional knowledge, right? Maybe no consensus, but certainly not nilly willy.bearsbearsbears wrote:There isn't much of a "tradition" of aging oolongs. Roastings and storage conditions were shopkeeper experimentations after they were confronted with unsold volumes of tea. Each shop has a different approach on keeping oolongs: whether to roast them, how to roast them, how to store them. Shop owners generally aren't master tea roasters, and procedures vary from shop to shop. There's no traditional knowledge regarding roasting and storage. There's simply no consensus.tenuki wrote:From what I understand aging processing has traditionally been a household knowledge sort of thing and isn't 'recent' really.
I think where we're not saying the same thing is the difference between approach, tradition, and knowledge. Also, I think the vastly different storage and roasting methods used throughout Asia do imply a "willy-nilly" approach to the process of aging oolongs as a whole, even if shops maintain their own "traditions". I don't find good evidence of any standard "knowledge" about aging oolongs, and personally find more satisfaction in tasting this diversity and experimentation than in choosing the one or two trans-pacific shops'/vendors' ideas regarding aged oolong preparation. I don't mix of trust and money if I don't have to.tenuki wrote: that's what I meant by household knowledge, ie each household/shop had their own 'formula/process'. We are saying the same thing bears. Each shop has a tradition/approach, that would be traditional knowledge, right? Maybe no consensus, but certainly not nilly willy.
Oh brother, see the OP....bearsbearsbears wrote:Simplifying the process, while it's convenient and easy to digest for someone new to aged oolongs, doesn't give an accurate picture about the haphazardry that is oolong aging in Asia for the past 50 years
omegapd wrote:Oolong ignorant here...
Ignorance isn't an excuse to expound a partial truth.tenuki wrote:Oh brother, see the OP....omegapd wrote:Oolong ignorant here...
I was wrong, thanks so much for giving the complete picture.bearsbearsbears wrote:Ignorance isn't an excuse to expound a partial truth.tenuki wrote:Oh brother, see the OP....omegapd wrote:Oolong ignorant here...Oolong isn't easy or convenient to learn about, aged oolong far less so. That's one reason why it's so fun.