
Still yes.

Oh, come on, get nasty for once!chamekke wrote: I just wanted to add that I do regret the abrasive tone of my posting above. My remarks were NOT meant as a personal comment on anyone, but it sure may have sounded like it. For this, I apologize unreservedly.
Whatever political- or tea-related differences we may have, I regard everyone here as a friend.
That heart-weeping comments, I salute your point.chamekke wrote:Chip, since you posted on the heels of my answer (which was intended to be tactfully short), I think I must respond.
No, the Olympics do not mean more to me because it's in China and China was the first to discover tea.
I love Chinese classical music and have been interested in Chinese arts, culture, and history for as long as I can remember. My opposition to China's oppressive state apparatus is just that: opposition to the way it hurts its people, especially the poorest and most powerless. This does not imply an aversion to Chinese people or its culture, quite the reverse. That is why I find the circumstances surrounding these Olympics particularly odious. I have seen too much footage of too many elderly Chinese, weeping as they tell how they were forced from their humble Beijing homes, often with little or no reimbursement, to make way for the grand Olympic facilities. Unknown thousands, if not tens of thousands, cast into homelessness in their old age. This is not the traditional culture of China, it is an abomination.
And that is a fraction of what I might say. So I hope you are not implying that people who oppose the Olympics are necessarily anti-Chinese. Some of us oppose the glossy spectacle because it seems to make some people (and I don't mean Chip or anyone else on this forum - I am speaking more generally) forget how odious China's government actually is, and the harm it's doing its own people. Setting aside the question of the welfare of the people of Tibet, Darfur, Burma...
If you think this is too political, please feel free to delete it. I am sure it is probably not welcome.
I've heard this before. Perhaps it's my just bias since I grew up in a democracy, but not granting one group freedom, becuase then you'll just have to give other people freedom, too, doesn't sound right to me.chrl42 wrote:And Tibet..besides their claiming that Tibel has been part of China since Tang dynasty, one reason China can't free Tibet is because there are other 55 ethnic minorities. Simply speaking, if they free Tibet then other ethnic minorities will claim for freedom. It means it literally is collapsing of China. Geographically and historically (some of dynasties were ruled by ethnic minorities). Positive for them is lots of ethnic races got along about fine with the goverment, but not religious ones (tibetans, ugrians).
Oh, Space, I don't think Chrl42 is apologizing for the Chinese government or saying they are right, just explaining their realpolitik rationale, the logic behind the repression. That doesn't make it right, just expedient from their point of view.Space Samurai wrote: I've heard this before. Perhaps it's my just bias since I grew up in a democracy, but not granting one group freedom, becuase then you'll just have to give other people freedom, too, doesn't sound right to me.
Geological or ethnic debate regarding history can be as complicated as red indians to israelis/palestanian and Chinese/tibetan.Space Samurai wrote:I've heard this before. Perhaps it's my just bias since I grew up in a democracy, but not granting one group freedom, becuase then you'll just have to give other people freedom, too, doesn't sound right to me.chrl42 wrote:And Tibet..besides their claiming that Tibel has been part of China since Tang dynasty, one reason China can't free Tibet is because there are other 55 ethnic minorities. Simply speaking, if they free Tibet then other ethnic minorities will claim for freedom. It means it literally is collapsing of China. Geographically and historically (some of dynasties were ruled by ethnic minorities). Positive for them is lots of ethnic races got along about fine with the goverment, but not religious ones (tibetans, ugrians).
The Government is VERY afraid of losing power. Of losing control.chrl42 wrote:Geological or ethnic debate regarding history can be as complicated as red indians to israelis/palestanian and Chinese/tibetan.
By the way, I didn't support any action the Chinese goverment on Tibet I just mentioned the goverment is VERY afraid of this ethnic minority issue..