Apologia

TeaChat regulars' private forum.


User avatar
Aug 26th, '08, 17:08
Posts: 1598
Joined: Jan 11th, '07, 16:13
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

by scruffmcgruff » Aug 26th, '08, 17:08

El Padre wrote:You seem to only be factoring in humans, which is blatant species-ism.
Indeed. There are some animals out there that make our swords look like butter knives. Ed, for example.

[And I wonder why I was on the receiving end of the banhammer?]

Aug 26th, '08, 19:04

by Ed » Aug 26th, '08, 19:04

Hey, I had the sense to keep my rocket in my pocket on the first day of the return of teh IM. If I didn't know better, I'd think you were trying to be the first sucka banned. :P

User avatar
Aug 26th, '08, 19:15
Posts: 1598
Joined: Jan 11th, '07, 16:13
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

by scruffmcgruff » Aug 26th, '08, 19:15

Ed wrote:Hey, I had the sense to keep my rocket in my pocket on the first day of the return of teh IM. If I didn't know better, I'd think you were trying to be the first sucka banned. :P
Well, you *did* bust out the "skin flute" reference, but you stopped there. :P
Tea Nerd - www.teanerd.com

User avatar
Aug 26th, '08, 21:40
Posts: 1459
Joined: Dec 20th, '06, 15:10

by Mary R » Aug 26th, '08, 21:40

olivierco wrote:
Mary R wrote:Can't, oh, 99.999999999% of the world's male population say the same? :twisted:
Mary, your percentage is actually incorrect.
99.999999999% is one in 100 000 000 000 which exceeds the earth population.
...at this time. My math is correct if you factor in multiple generations. :twisted:

User avatar
Aug 26th, '08, 21:48
Posts: 1136
Joined: Dec 2nd, '07, 17:53
Location: New York

by joelbct » Aug 26th, '08, 21:48

Mary R wrote:...at this time. My math is correct if you factor in multiple generations. :twisted:
I thought the number was lower. But apparently the 100 billion range is in the upper level of estimates... Guess it depends how far back you start counting them as 'human' and not just 'primate...'

This Chart is pretty interesting too, apparently there were just about a million of our direct ancestors around in 10,000 BC, and as few as 2,000 of us worldwide in 70,000 BC... see, I always say we are all related... kinda scary though...

User avatar
Aug 26th, '08, 22:01
Posts: 1459
Joined: Dec 20th, '06, 15:10

by Mary R » Aug 26th, '08, 22:01

'Course, you do have to halve the Haub number to get the historical male population...so by the time we do get that 'special' guy, it'll probably be the herald of the second coming. Joy and joyness.

User avatar
Aug 26th, '08, 22:22
Posts: 1559
Joined: Jan 28th, '07, 02:24
Location: Fort Worth, TX

by Space Samurai » Aug 26th, '08, 22:22

Just sayin', for the record and all, that my penis never got me in any trouble that wasn't totally worth it.

User avatar
Aug 26th, '08, 22:53
Posts: 5151
Joined: Dec 20th, '06, 23:33
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Been thanked: 1 time

by Salsero » Aug 26th, '08, 22:53

Space Samurai wrote: Just sayin', for the record and all, that my penis never got me in any trouble that wasn't totally worth it.
  • Image

Aug 26th, '08, 22:57

by Ed » Aug 26th, '08, 22:57

Wish I could say the same :cry:

Locked