outer layer VS inner layer

One of the intentionally aged teas, Pu-Erh has a loyal following.


Dec 10th, '10, 10:25
Posts: 1274
Joined: May 9th, '09, 15:59

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by shah82 » Dec 10th, '10, 10:25

With cloths, I entirely agree. I've largely have had to swear off sportswear on ebay because the fake, or low quality, or whatever, is pervasive that branding doesn't protect against.

Funny how it works just fine for designer shirts and pants. You only have to worry about exact fit and how worn it is if it's used...

User avatar
Dec 10th, '10, 14:30
Posts: 2000
Joined: Mar 3rd, '09, 17:18

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by entropyembrace » Dec 10th, '10, 14:30

the_economist wrote:
shah82 wrote: Virtually nothing in the West has that kind of abusive practice. Darwinian weeding of underperformers is fairly fast.
Nonsense. underperforming leather shoes manufactured by branded names are entirely overpriced by several factors :) i only know this trivia because i recently hunted for a pair of formal shoes for graduation and stumbled on a whole boatload of info regarding leather shoe make. Its the old "make something seem nicer than it really is" trick. Although admittedly it might be less rampant.
There are soooooooooooooooo many overpriced, poorly made shoes and boots out there. They´ve absolutely flooded the malls in North America. It´s very hard to find good footwear.

And unfortunately the prices really don´t reflect the quality.

User avatar
Dec 10th, '10, 14:59
Posts: 517
Joined: Jan 30th, '08, 09:15

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by betta » Dec 10th, '10, 14:59

MarshalN wrote: Absolutely not true. Covering the surface of cakes with nicer looking leaves is an age-honoured practice going back to at least the 19th century -- British observers who visited Yunnan mentioned this practice as being common. You mean to tell me that those 19th century cakes are all false production too?
Maybe I got it wrong.
I can understand if it can be regarded as "marketing strategy". But what's honourable from such a practice?
I personally prefer uniform leaves in a cake, so that I don't have to break an entire cake and mix it in a storage jar.

User avatar
Dec 10th, '10, 16:43
Vendor Member
Posts: 2084
Joined: Sep 24th, '08, 18:38
Location: Boston, MA

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by gingkoseto » Dec 10th, '10, 16:43

betta wrote:
MarshalN wrote: Absolutely not true. Covering the surface of cakes with nicer looking leaves is an age-honoured practice going back to at least the 19th century -- British observers who visited Yunnan mentioned this practice as being common. You mean to tell me that those 19th century cakes are all false production too?
Maybe I got it wrong.
I can understand if it can be regarded as "marketing strategy". But what's honourable from such a practice?
I personally prefer uniform leaves in a cake, so that I don't have to break an entire cake and mix it in a storage jar.
I guess it's honored mainly because it's not easily done. In the old days, it took a worker a lot of training to learn how to do the covering properly. It's like if blending white flour and whole wheat, extremely few people can mange to make a dough with whole wheat only on the surface. A researcher of Yunnan culture wrote in 1930s that "it was deemed as loss of professional honor if a worker blend tea leaves of different grades evenly in a cake/tuo". I guess it was because anyone untrained could do it but only trained workers could do a nice covering job.

User avatar
Dec 10th, '10, 16:54
Vendor Member
Posts: 2084
Joined: Sep 24th, '08, 18:38
Location: Boston, MA

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by gingkoseto » Dec 10th, '10, 16:54

entropyembrace wrote:
the_economist wrote:
shah82 wrote: Virtually nothing in the West has that kind of abusive practice. Darwinian weeding of underperformers is fairly fast.
Nonsense. underperforming leather shoes manufactured by branded names are entirely overpriced by several factors :) i only know this trivia because i recently hunted for a pair of formal shoes for graduation and stumbled on a whole boatload of info regarding leather shoe make. Its the old "make something seem nicer than it really is" trick. Although admittedly it might be less rampant.
There are soooooooooooooooo many overpriced, poorly made shoes and boots out there. They´ve absolutely flooded the malls in North America. It´s very hard to find good footwear.

And unfortunately the prices really don´t reflect the quality.
I used to LOVE buying shoes! :D I can proudly say, I seldom bought shoes with a discount less than 70% off. IMO, It's not a bad thing that rich people buy over-priced shoes and ordinary people buy post-seasonal sales with a deep discount :D

User avatar
Dec 10th, '10, 17:18
Posts: 2000
Joined: Mar 3rd, '09, 17:18

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by entropyembrace » Dec 10th, '10, 17:18

gingkoseto wrote:
entropyembrace wrote:
the_economist wrote:
shah82 wrote: Virtually nothing in the West has that kind of abusive practice. Darwinian weeding of underperformers is fairly fast.
Nonsense. underperforming leather shoes manufactured by branded names are entirely overpriced by several factors :) i only know this trivia because i recently hunted for a pair of formal shoes for graduation and stumbled on a whole boatload of info regarding leather shoe make. Its the old "make something seem nicer than it really is" trick. Although admittedly it might be less rampant.
There are soooooooooooooooo many overpriced, poorly made shoes and boots out there. They´ve absolutely flooded the malls in North America. It´s very hard to find good footwear.

And unfortunately the prices really don´t reflect the quality.
I used to LOVE buying shoes! :D I can proudly say, I seldom bought shoes with a discount less than 70% off. IMO, It's not a bad thing that rich people buy over-priced shoes and ordinary people buy post-seasonal sales with a deep discount :D
Even 70% off I wouldn´t want most of the shoes I see in the malls :?

It´s mostly cheap pvc that´s been sloppily put together....have to really hunt to find anything better.

Worst is when it´s cheap grey PVC and to make the colours they just paint them...then the paint starts flaking off :shock:

Also the heels often look like they´ll come off fairly easily :evil:

But that stuff sells at $100 to $200 a pair somehow...

User avatar
Dec 11th, '10, 00:36
Posts: 2061
Joined: Mar 15th, '06, 17:43
Contact: MarshalN

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by MarshalN » Dec 11th, '10, 00:36

betta wrote:
MarshalN wrote: Absolutely not true. Covering the surface of cakes with nicer looking leaves is an age-honoured practice going back to at least the 19th century -- British observers who visited Yunnan mentioned this practice as being common. You mean to tell me that those 19th century cakes are all false production too?
Maybe I got it wrong.
I can understand if it can be regarded as "marketing strategy". But what's honourable from such a practice?
I personally prefer uniform leaves in a cake, so that I don't have to break an entire cake and mix it in a storage jar.
Because the mixing of the tea is an art, and it's very difficult to do well.

The proper mix will yield a fuller cup that is not attainable with single estate teas. That's how all vintage puerh (up until pretty much the 90s) were made. The idea that a cake should be uniform inside and out is an entirely new concept to puerh making, and has no historical basis of any kind. If we are serious about getting teas that will age well in the future, and if we judge past performance as our yardstick, then clearly blending is the way to go.

The idea that you break off chunks of tea to drink at at time is already a deviation from what has always been done, which is to break cakes in their entirety and then mixed up, put in a jar and consumed that way.

User avatar
Dec 11th, '10, 01:24
Posts: 702
Joined: Sep 4th, '10, 18:25
Scrolling: scrolling
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by the_economist » Dec 11th, '10, 01:24

this is excellent info! maybe it would make sense to return to this.

Dec 11th, '10, 10:41
Posts: 1274
Joined: May 9th, '09, 15:59

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by shah82 » Dec 11th, '10, 10:41

/me hands the_economist some Xiaguan tuos..

You do them, my hands are tired. And my mallet is broken.

User avatar
Dec 11th, '10, 14:03
Posts: 517
Joined: Jan 30th, '08, 09:15

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by betta » Dec 11th, '10, 14:03

MarshalN wrote:
The proper mix will yield a fuller cup that is not attainable with single estate teas. That's how all vintage puerh (up until pretty much the 90s) were made. The idea that a cake should be uniform inside and out is an entirely new concept to puerh making, and has no historical basis of any kind. If we are serious about getting teas that will age well in the future, and if we judge past performance as our yardstick, then clearly blending is the way to go.

The idea that you break off chunks of tea to drink at at time is already a deviation from what has always been done, which is to break cakes in their entirety and then mixed up, put in a jar and consumed that way.
Thanks for clearing up this issue.
I'm well aware of the importance of blending to achieve certain objectives, including in terms of puerh tea. As a result, I always break entire tea cake, mixed it in the storage jar and consume it slowly while letting it ages there. I have limited amount of storage jars, therefore I could only break several cakes so far.

User avatar
Dec 12th, '10, 20:55
Posts: 702
Joined: Sep 4th, '10, 18:25
Scrolling: scrolling
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: outer layer VS inner layer

by the_economist » Dec 12th, '10, 20:55

shah82 wrote:/me hands the_economist some Xiaguan tuos..

You do them, my hands are tired. And my mallet is broken.
lol! put some qi into it :)

+ Post Reply