a.serrao wrote:
However I think that to refuse the tests put farmers in a bad light to the consumers.
Well let me put it this way, I was exposed a bit to how a municipal water system works through working for one for several summers and winters. Now to ensure we met safety standards we would have to take water samples, some of our raw water which is water before it goes through processing and treatment. And also our finished product from several locations throughout the system. Which is equivalent in this instance to testing raw leaves, and the product sent out to the customers.
The equivalent to forcing producers to get Aracha tested, would be to choose a process the water undergoes, say softening, or addition of Chlorine, and forcing us to take samples of the water right after undergoing one process. Now while this does not sound like a bad idea, it really boils down to extra costs, when if anything was wrong at the intermediate step, it would be evident at the final step.
In short this is a production process, and while things change during the process, if you test raw product and finished product, why does it matter if you do not check Aracha that is not intended for sale?