LOL- in other words we eat any damn thing and often too much of it.gingkoseto wrote:I feel it's partially because Americans have stronger stomachs averagely. It's not physically possible for everyone to handle high ratio, if if they want to.

LOL- in other words we eat any damn thing and often too much of it.gingkoseto wrote:I feel it's partially because Americans have stronger stomachs averagely. It's not physically possible for everyone to handle high ratio, if if they want to.
I suspect it's stronger palates as much as stronger stomachs.But for the leaf/water ratio, I feel it's partially because Americans have stronger stomachs
Is there a difference in how the tea tastes doing it this way, and simply using a bigger teapot with the same amount of tea, but letting it steep a bit longer? A thickish yixing ought to retain the heat for that time, so you're not losing out there. Shouldn't the resulting soup from a 120ml pot be the same as when you put three consecutive infusions from a 40ml pot into a fairness cup?Some of the time I fill the fairness cup which takes 4-5 infusions with a 40ml pot.
Hear hear! You can say that again!gingkoseto wrote:I'm not saying it's mysterious for me to see people using small teapots of 120ml or even 90ml. But it's a little mysterious for me to see people looking so hard for small teapots of 50ml or smaller. ... Yeah I think price of tea, amount of tea, companionship all play a role in this phenomenon. But besides all this, I feel there is still a little mystery left.
For your style, I would totally understand it. I was mainly puzzled by the "trend" that there seem to be many people who are looking for small teapots. I wonder if they all have similar style as yours.tingjunkie wrote:I'm a bit surprised no one has chimed in regarding the size of the pot as related to the type of tea. I would never waste my time brewing green TGY or gao shan in a 40ml pot, since those expand so much, but when I brew high fire TGY, I like to nearly fill the pot and crush some leaf too. For this a 40ml pot is perfect.
Very expensive aged puerh is another tea I might make in a 40-50ml pot too. It won't expand all that much, and it helps conserve the tea. This has been discussed at length here, but drinking more short infusions out of a 1/2 full pot will give an extremely different experience than less longer infusions in a 1/4 full pot of double the size. For me, 3g of 30+ year old puerh in a 120ml pot is a crying shame.
gingkoseto wrote:For a lot of teas in oolong and puerh range, I use similar amount of tea in weight, although they may fill the pot differently due to the leaf shape.
tingjunkie wrote: For me, 3g of 30+ year old puerh in a 120ml pot is a crying shame.
I was actually talking about guesstimation of weight. I don't do weighing at all for tea drinking - nor do I have any other scientific method to estimate the amount of tea. You don't see a scale in a Chinese kitchen, or tearoomtheredbaron wrote:gingkoseto wrote:For a lot of teas in oolong and puerh range, I use similar amount of tea in weight, although they may fill the pot differently due to the leaf shape.
I would suggest not to be hung up on weight.
I think water to leave ratio is much more important. Every tea needs its own ratio (combined with water temperature, duration of infusion, etc). Personally - i never weigh my tea for drinking (and i have in all my years here in Asia never seen anyone doing that - the first time i came across this concept was here on the internet), but look how filled up with leaves my pot is.
Some of my Pu Erh's, for example, need a higher ratio, and others, while initially weak, develop over the brews very strong, and need a much smaller initial ratio.
Same is with my Yanchas - usually my top Yanchas need far less leaves than my every day Yancha.
Weight can be deceiving. Every tea needs to be looked at its own. Each category has different ratios, but also different quality levels have their own optimal ratio as well.
What I don't understand is why you are opening this thread.futurebird wrote:This is what I don't understand.
Oh SO sorry lol.bagua7 wrote:What I don't understand is why you are opening this thread?futurebird wrote:This is what I don't understand.![]()