Tead Off wrote:This is not surprising as I have witnessed a lot of dissent in pottery circles regarding some other potters who have great success yet are not too popular with their peers. Whether it's jealousy or politically motivated, or possibly other potters may not share the taste of someone like Seigan.
rdl wrote:But I am very curious when you point out those who are not real Hagi-yaki artists? What exactly do you mean, and where do you get this information? Seigan is a member of the Hagi Association I mentioned above, whereas Shibuya is not, at least at last printing which is a bit outdated. Are you implying traditional vs. contemporary? Or acceptance? I appreciate the discussion.
It was not the words expressed by other Hagiyaki potters but by Hagi-city inhabitants met on the spot and by vendors ( incidentally, some of them were selling Seigan's works !).
For Deishi Shibuya, i know he is a Hagi artist associate member and was president of the Hagi traditional-handicrafts association ... i don't think it's important, as there is so many associations of that kind in Japan. I don't know if Eiichi Shibuya is member of a potter association, but the prize he win in 2011 opened him access to Uragami Museum collections and placed him at a level well above is grandfather or Seigan.
I have many Seigan's works and i find him innovative ... but whoever went to Hagi-city can't deny that most of its production is bulk order work sold to the curiosity or tourist shops, maybe that's why some would depreciate ?