User avatar
Mar 20th, '14, 22:07
Posts: 4536
Joined: Apr 1st, '09, 00:48
Location: Bangkok

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by Tead Off » Mar 20th, '14, 22:07

chrl42 wrote:
Tead Off wrote:
chrl42 wrote:
Tead Off wrote:
wert wrote:
Tead Off wrote: Can you show an example?
joint.jpg
I see, but can you show any with join showing near handle or spout on early pots?
I doubt that has, that's joint line from moulds, those lines are often found on Factory-1 pots.
Now, I'm a bit confused. You said earlier that half-handmade don't show join lines. Why is it different for Factory 1 pots that use molds?
In fact, both. Just lines on half hand-made are not as clear as full hand-made pots.

Factory-1 for example, the earlier the period it is, the clear the lines are shown.
Is this true for the join line on the outside of pot where handle or spout is attached?

User avatar
Mar 20th, '14, 22:52
Posts: 1885
Joined: Mar 22nd, '08, 22:26
Location: Yixing

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by chrl42 » Mar 20th, '14, 22:52

Tead Off wrote:
chrl42 wrote:
Tead Off wrote:
chrl42 wrote:
Tead Off wrote:
wert wrote:
Tead Off wrote: Can you show an example?
joint.jpg
I see, but can you show any with join showing near handle or spout on early pots?
I doubt that has, that's joint line from moulds, those lines are often found on Factory-1 pots.
Now, I'm a bit confused. You said earlier that half-handmade don't show join lines. Why is it different for Factory 1 pots that use molds?
In fact, both. Just lines on half hand-made are not as clear as full hand-made pots.

Factory-1 for example, the earlier the period it is, the clear the lines are shown.
Is this true for the join line on the outside of pot where handle or spout is attached?
From what I know, joint lines are seen outside as well but very faintly, and sometimes on half hand-pots, too...

Mar 21st, '14, 02:41
Posts: 21
Joined: Jan 5th, '14, 02:14
Location: Java

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by devilducklings » Mar 21st, '14, 02:41

Very interesting discussion on joint lines.
Up to now, my experience has been limited to cheap yixing which surely non handmade (maybe not even half handmade).
They dont have any joint lines inside the pot's inner wall or where the wall join the base (but usually they have scrapped marks where the wall join the base, maybe this is what charl meant as to disguised it as to look like more handmade in the eyes of non expert?)
However some of them show joint lines outside of the pots, usually above and bellow spout and handle.

Another thing that pops up in my mind is the difference of join line in my previously uploaded "laozhuni" pots.
I suppose now both of them are highly unlikely to be handmade (half mold more likely), but one has untouched join line and the other concealed.
Is this what charl and teadoff talk about?
(Sorry for re-uploading them, just for the shake of discussion. These two are most likely from same clay, same craftmanship, same price range, possibly same studio)

on closer observation, both pots also shows the shrinkage in the inner wall same as what kyarazen has shown earlier.
Attachments
pot2c.jpg
pot2c.jpg (16.05 KiB) Viewed 762 times
pot1c rez.jpg
pot1c rez.jpg (40.83 KiB) Viewed 762 times
Last edited by devilducklings on Mar 21st, '14, 04:31, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mar 21st, '14, 03:02
Posts: 4536
Joined: Apr 1st, '09, 00:48
Location: Bangkok

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by Tead Off » Mar 21st, '14, 03:02

If I am not mistaken, this is what chrl42 refers to as handmade join lines. Did I understand correctly?

What I was originally trying to understand was the exterior join lines near spout and handle and whether these were signs of mold use or handmade. I am still unclear about these points because I believe I have seen these lines on both handmade and half made. I guess by combining all facets of the join lines, both interior and exterior, you get a better picture of how the pot was made.

The link that Wert posted showing the making of a pot using a mold is very interesting. Yours do not look like mold made but I can't see every join line on them.

Mar 21st, '14, 03:29
Posts: 21
Joined: Jan 5th, '14, 02:14
Location: Java

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by devilducklings » Mar 21st, '14, 03:29

Tead Off wrote:I guess by combining all facets of the join lines, both interior and exterior, you get a better picture of how the pot was made.

The link that Wert posted showing the making of a pot using a mold is very interesting. Yours do not look like mold made but I can't see every join line on them.
The exterior of my friend's pots dont exhibit any joint lines above/bellow spot and handle (there is no vertical line from above to bellow where the mold joins).
Where as in the inside, we could see join line of the walls and wall-to-base line.
Those untouched join line was what made me think it is full handmade when I first saw it.

User avatar
Mar 21st, '14, 05:49
Posts: 1885
Joined: Mar 22nd, '08, 22:26
Location: Yixing

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by chrl42 » Mar 21st, '14, 05:49

devilducklings wrote:Very interesting discussion on joint lines.
Up to now, my experience has been limited to cheap yixing which surely non handmade (maybe not even half handmade).
They dont have any joint lines inside the pot's inner wall or where the wall join the base (but usually they have scrapped marks where the wall join the base, maybe this is what charl meant as to disguised it as to look like more handmade in the eyes of non expert?)
However some of them show joint lines outside of the pots, usually above and bellow spout and handle.

Another thing that pops up in my mind is the difference of join line in my previously uploaded "laozhuni" pots.
I suppose now both of them are highly unlikely to be handmade (half mold more likely), but one has untouched join line and the other concealed.
Is this what charl and teadoff talk about?
(Sorry for re-uploading them, just for the shake of discussion. These two are most likely from same clay, same craftmanship, same price range, possibly same studio)

on closer observation, both pots also shows the shrinkage in the inner wall same as what kyarazen has shown earlier.
2nd pic is not clear, but 1st pic follows that hand-made interior OR imitated one, either way it's not typical half hand-made interior.

Joint line in the back of the wall, sometimes they can be faint depending on potter's trimming process, sometimes even wall-base joint lines can be faint. But still different from half hand-made pots' that you could touch to find those lines or marks are done more clearly, as opposed to ramdomly done on half hand-made's.

And over the long period of using, those lines and trimmed marks will be more noticeable than they just got out of the kilns.

Half hand-made pots exterior could have those trimming marks as well, but full hand-made pots marks are usually much neater and done well.

User avatar
Mar 21st, '14, 06:36
Posts: 1144
Joined: Jul 10th, '13, 01:38
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Japan.

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by William » Mar 21st, '14, 06:36

chrl42 wrote: CR doesn't have Zhuni. 5~60s SPs have wrinkles though, those were very early stage of using moulds, so the ratio of hand-making was higher compared to now. 5~60s SPs also have joint lines, but not as clear as fully hand-made pots of Qing/ROC.
Thanks for the clarification, Chrl. :)

User avatar
Mar 22nd, '14, 11:34
Posts: 91
Joined: Sep 11th, '11, 00:31

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by achyle » Mar 22nd, '14, 11:34

Hi Guys,
I really like this discussion and that's why I'd like to get your opinions on this one.
Claims to be from 1952, Zhuni from Huanglong Mountain, Handmade.

Someone translated Seal to the guy I bought it from, see link:
http://lejardindethe.blogspot.be/2008/1 ... -seal.html

Capacity: 140ml and kind of heavy for this size; 189g.

This pot has no joint lines but I can almost feel them on my fingers, it has also a lot of wrinkles all around the pot but these are more smaller and less bumpy than some of my Zhunis.

See below pictures for reference and link: http://lejardindethe.blogspot.ca/2013/0 ... ni-de.html

The seal also claims that the pot was wood fired and I think every pre-60 were wood fired if I`m not mistaken, I remember Billy Mood talking about very specific marks that has a wood fired pot, Hence my question: what kind of marks should I be looking at?
What do you think guys, Handmade ?
Thank you in advance for your replies.
140ml zhuni 12 (1 of 1).jpg
140ml zhuni 12 (1 of 1).jpg (19.99 KiB) Viewed 729 times
140ml zhuni -8.jpg
140ml zhuni -8.jpg (26.27 KiB) Viewed 729 times
140ml zhuni -5.jpg
140ml zhuni -5.jpg (30.24 KiB) Viewed 729 times
Last edited by achyle on Mar 22nd, '14, 11:40, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mar 22nd, '14, 11:36
Posts: 91
Joined: Sep 11th, '11, 00:31

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by achyle » Mar 22nd, '14, 11:36

More pics:
140ml zhuni skirt-1.jpg
140ml zhuni skirt-1.jpg (26.21 KiB) Viewed 728 times
140ml zhuni -3.jpg
140ml zhuni -3.jpg (20.73 KiB) Viewed 728 times
140ml zhuni -2.jpg
140ml zhuni -2.jpg (15.05 KiB) Viewed 728 times

User avatar
Mar 22nd, '14, 11:38
Posts: 91
Joined: Sep 11th, '11, 00:31

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by achyle » Mar 22nd, '14, 11:38

final Pics:
140ml zhuni -6.jpg
140ml zhuni -6.jpg (23.42 KiB) Viewed 730 times
140ml zhuni -4.jpg
140ml zhuni -4.jpg (21.03 KiB) Viewed 730 times
140ml zhuni -1.jpg
140ml zhuni -1.jpg (16.95 KiB) Viewed 730 times

User avatar
Mar 22nd, '14, 11:54
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sep 2nd, '13, 03:22
Location: in your tea closet
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact: kyarazen

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by kyarazen » Mar 22nd, '14, 11:54

very very interesting pot

Mar 22nd, '14, 12:07
Posts: 226
Joined: Aug 26th, '13, 18:29

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by wert » Mar 22nd, '14, 12:07

achyle wrote:Hi Guys,
I really like this discussion and that's why I'd like to get your opinions on this one.
Claims to be from 1952, Zhuni from Huanglong Mountain, Handmade.

---snip---
140ml zhuni 12 (1 of 1).jpg
140ml zhuni -8.jpg
140ml zhuni -5.jpg
Exercise caution.

User avatar
Mar 22nd, '14, 12:32
Posts: 317
Joined: Sep 8th, '12, 12:26
Scrolling: scrolling

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by Devoted135 » Mar 22nd, '14, 12:32

This has turned into a very helpful and informative discussion that is not really at home in this particular thread.

Chip, I'd like to request that the various yixing discussions that started with devilducklings' request for help back on page 14 (March 18th) be split into its own topic. Thanks for considering it!

User avatar
Mar 22nd, '14, 12:33
Posts: 4536
Joined: Apr 1st, '09, 00:48
Location: Bangkok

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by Tead Off » Mar 22nd, '14, 12:33

Where is the 1952 claim?

User avatar
Mar 22nd, '14, 13:42
Posts: 91
Joined: Sep 11th, '11, 00:31

Re: Not my teaware.....but I wish it were....

by achyle » Mar 22nd, '14, 13:42

Tead Off wrote:Where is the 1952 claim?
on the lid skirt

+ Post Reply