"What a strawman," I have no clue what you are even implying? Can you please explain this?
Its a fallacious form of argument. Essentially you attack a very weak, comical, version of an argument instead of the actual argument.
Anyone? I was directly referring to your post.
I didn't think so, hence the charge of strawmaning.
I would say the risk of possible failure is well worth it given the successful innovations along the way. To not try a new methodology simply because it sounds like it is crossing the line of traditionalists/absolutists would be tragic.
Another strawman. You are putting words into my mouth. I don't that you understand the how I used the word absolutist. In the context I admitted to being one, it just means one that believes that truth exists. I also don't see why you associate traditionalists and absolutists. Finally, I think it would be tragic if every product introduced to the market place were immune to critique. However, I am certainly not suggesting that there should be some injunction against the creation of this product and from an ethical standpoint I am glad it brings you pleasure. The same goes for people who like Coca Cola, McDonald's, and, *gasp*, even the NFL. [I don't mean to imply that fukamushi is at the level of the above things, certainly it requires more talent in aesthetic appreciation.]
P.S. The original comment was meant as a joke. I think that beer people, whether or not they like extreme beer, would at least find mildly amusing. I am pretty sure there are at least a few on this form that fit the target audience.