hop_goblin wrote:I think you are just trying to insult the intelligence of the contributors in this forum. People understand exactly what is meant by the word gongfu when a YiXing or Gaiwan and tea tray or tea boat are involved.
I'm not trying to insult the intelligence of the contributers at all. All I was trying to say (and the comments in this thread seem to bear this out) is that the term means different things to different people, even without getting all philisophical. So I don't think it's true that people "understand exactly what is meant".
I'm not trying to play "semantic games"... (or, for that matter, to insult anyone, hear myself talk, make this into something way too serious, or get into a ridiculous flamewar). I don't think I've said anything so far that is a personal attack on anyone here.
I honestly think that (like most things in tea), there are a wide range of opinions about what the term means, and how broad its definition is, and I don't think there's anything wrong with talking about that. I wasn't trying to say that anyone's personal idea of what the term means is "wrong".
hop_goblin wrote:However, and for the most part, the meaning of gongfu in Tea Chat parlance is using a YiXing or Gaiwan, rinse with multiple infusions.
Plenty of people don't like to rinse. And what about using other types of stoneware pots (pots made of Chaozhou clay, Taiwanese clay) - do they count? What about a small ceramic pot? Does the type of tea matter? The size of the brewing vessel? Do 2 or 3 infusions count as "multiple" (of course technically they do)? Ok, maybe I'm being argumentative here, but I'm just trying to make a point. Even if people do share some general ideas about what it means, it's not so simple to define it in a few words.
Yixing pots and gaiwans have a long history in China, and have been used widely across a very large country in different times and places for different purposes. I think there are a lot of ways to brew and drink tea that would fall under your definition, but that most people would not consider
gong fu cha. I think the actual procedure, whether or not it's an exact sequence of steps, matters, as does the type of tea, size of the brewing vessel / cups, though the specifics of these may have regional variations. And yes, to some extent, maybe the attention to detail on the part of the person brewing matters too.
Most of the time when I'm brewing, whether at work or at home, I brew in a pretty eclectic style that I guess most people would roughly describe as
gong fu, but I honestly don't spend a lot of time thinking about what it's called. and w/r/t the poll, to say something like "I
exclusively brew tea this way" seems even more limiting. Surely all tea drinkers make tea in a casual way, or under less than perfect circumstances some of the time?
I'm not trying to say that it has to be some sort of mystical thing that can't be defined. But I am personally hard-pressed to come up with a definition that fits too.