Precisely. The key work there is "percieved". Perception is not equal with reality.a.serrao wrote:It's the perceived danger that arise from drinking radioactive tea.
Misinformation can cause people to "percieve" that the risks are far greater than they are.... thereby possibly causing unwarranted economic damage to some poor innocent people who are getting caught in the crossfire of misinformation, anacdotal "evidence", people outright misrepresrnting facts on the net, and other such junk that is floating around on this subject.
Science is the key to any really accurate information here. And not "lay science". To really know what is going on, we need infomation from people who have prepared to study this catastrophe by studying this nuclear physis and nuclear medicine subject academically and hold advanced degrees, and with them using the best available labratory grade equipment.
If "anyone" can use such equipment and draw accurate results and accurate conclusions form any data obtained.... then why the heck do people study this field as an academic subject? Hey folks..... save youreself the tuition

Everything else is just so much "smoke". So to keep agressively perpertuating the "smoke" as some sort of "facts" is a dis-service.
This is an example of what I mean by "smoke". In some ways it reminds me of the commercials on American TV that end with "No, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night". There is nothing credible nor informative in this posting. Is is just an unsubstantiated negative comment about the safety of Japanese teas. With NO real NUMBERS ....let alone even knowing if the numbers supplied are ACCURATE.lkj23 wrote:My coworker has told me this morning that her friend who usually buy tea from japan on the net has bought a geiger counter and he has found radioactivity on 2 teas.
It is the classic example we use in acadeaemia of the, "A friend of a friend of a friend told me so it must be true" mistake in supporting a statement. It is total heresay.
Did you know that all bananas are radioactive? You can research the accuracy of that one quite easily.
best,
.............john