E.g. the traditional use of tatami, the origin of chanoyu, the iron kettles, the way Nabe (a Japanese hot pot dish) is prepared .. and a few other thousands things!Tead Off wrote:Not sure what you mean by found only in Korean culture.

E.g. the traditional use of tatami, the origin of chanoyu, the iron kettles, the way Nabe (a Japanese hot pot dish) is prepared .. and a few other thousands things!Tead Off wrote:Not sure what you mean by found only in Korean culture.
Not so sure about that list either.William wrote:E.g. the traditional use of tatami, the origin of chanoyu, the iron kettles, the way Nabe (a Japanese hot pot dish) is prepared .. and a few other thousands things!
I've read his blog many times. He makes some interesting proposals, and provides some scholarly documentation, for sure. However, his suppositions are not widely accepted by those who are also considered 'scholars' in the field. Even he says that there is no real proof for what he stipulates.William wrote:For chanoyu real origin read this essay: http://chanoyu-to-wa.tumblr.com/post/28 ... connection
Thanks for your opinion.JBaymore wrote:
I've read his blog many times. He makes some interesting proposals, and provides some scholarly documentation, for sure. However, his suppositions are not widely accepted by those who are also considered 'scholars' in the field. Even he says that there is no real proof for what he stipulates.
Even speaking as a college professor who teaches some art history..... his postings are exceptionally 'long-winded'. He could do with a good editor.
For your particular contention, a lot depends on how you define the "roots" of Chanoyu also. To me the core roots tend to be all the way back to the tea drinking practices in China.
There is no question that huge amounts of "Chinese" influences reached Japan via the landmass that is Korea. One can find that in looking even somewhat casually at architecture, the visual, theatre, and written arts, and so on.
What is "purely" Korean, having no Chinese nor Japanese antecedents..... well, that is harder to find.
The long standing animosities between China, Korea, and Japan are certainly a potential factor in the "acceptance" of anything that does not reflect positively on one particular country over another. No question there either. That fact does not make his various suppositions correct however.
Terribly interesting person in some ways... but at the moment is it is mostly one person's views in a sea of other people's views. Could he be right.... of course. IS he right....... no one knows.
best,
.....................john
Thanks (again) for the tip! Another book to buy!hobin wrote:Interesting matter indeed.
There's a recent book - "Tollini - La Cultura del Te" (Einaudi - only in Italian, unfortunately) that deals with the origins of chanoyu. It is well documented and a thorough read (at the end there are translations of classic Japanese texts about chanoyu).
As chrl42 points out, Joseon period put the clamps on Buddhist practices and philosophy for centuries and the Japanese had the final coup de tete (my term) to suppress all Korean culture during their colonization of Korea which ended after WWII. A read of Brother Anthony's book 'The Korean Way of Tea' sheds some light on this and the 'rebirth' of Korea's interest in tea. But to equate the Chanoyu with Korean culture is a grave misunderstanding. And, I also have no clue to why you say tetsubin also originated in Korea. The Japanese are known to have pioneered cast iron kettles.William wrote:For chanoyu real origin read this essay: http://chanoyu-to-wa.tumblr.com/post/28 ... connection
For tetsubin (and tatami) origin I need to search on my laptop the essay I read.
Korean being affected by China and Japan (after 20th century) or America doesn't mean Korea doesn't have a own cultureTead Off wrote:As chrl42 points out, Joseon period put the clamps on Buddhist practices and philosophy for centuries and the Japanese had the final coup de tete (my term) to suppress all Korean culture during their colonization of Korea which ended after WWII. A read of Brother Anthony's book 'The Korean Way of Tea' sheds some light on this and the 'rebirth' of Korea's interest in tea. But to equate the Chanoyu with Korean culture is a grave misunderstanding. And, I also have no clue to why you say tetsubin also originated in Korea. The Japanese are known to have pioneered cast iron kettles.William wrote:For chanoyu real origin read this essay: http://chanoyu-to-wa.tumblr.com/post/28 ... connection
For tetsubin (and tatami) origin I need to search on my laptop the essay I read.
Korea may have served as a land bridge to China, and Buddhism was firmly established quite early, but all Japanese texts point to China as the source of their teachings, especially the great T'ang period when many of the Zen Patriarchs flourished and Japanese monks spent years learning and gathering teachings and returning to Japan.
As far as pottery goes, the Song dynasty really established its ceramics in conjunction with tea culture and powdered tea and served as the model which the Japanese scholars and monks took and developed their own way of Chanoyu which is not present either in China or Korea. What is present in Japan is the stylistic influence of the Song and Korean pottery styles which were then developed by the Japanese and integrated into their own culture. But, even Korea borrowed almost everything Chinese to eventually turn out something called 'Korean'. All of us are composites of everything that has come before us.
What is going on in Korea now is a kind of searching for a cultural identity that was taken from them through centuries of invasion and suppression. Christianity has also become very influential there to further complicate the equation of what it is to be 'Korean'. Can we say bibimbap is Korean?
sent you a PMWilliam wrote:Thanks (again) for the tip! Another book to buy!hobin wrote:Interesting matter indeed.
There's a recent book - "Tollini - La Cultura del Te" (Einaudi - only in Italian, unfortunately) that deals with the origins of chanoyu. It is well documented and a thorough read (at the end there are translations of classic Japanese texts about chanoyu).
Hah, after seeing your opening post, i kinda feel that tokoname chawan are less frequently seen or discussedhobin wrote:There's a lot of interest in tokoname but--is there anyone into bizen?