http://www.tokoname.or.jp/teapot/gallery.htm
This one is very pretty

This as well

This must be the flattest pot I've seen! It's for gyokuro, 70 ml volume. Not so pretty though...


+1 The flat one has a really nice shape. The gold is a bit much, but just right for someone.Victoria wrote:Very nice! I like them all. I am partial to flat ones, it's sweet!
+5 yeah totally!!Chip wrote:Yeah, I saw those. Nice selection. I wonder if they would be interested in doing a Special Offer to members of TeaChat.
The "issue" I have with the gyokuro pot above is that while the form of the pot from the claywork is very nice, and the surface of the body (tsuchiaji) is nice, the execution of the gold luster work on top is not particularly skillful in the handling of the brush. The quality of line of the gold work does not, for the most part, have any fluidity.
The contrast between the skillfully executed fluid forming work and the somewhat crude gold work creates a big "disconnect" in the overall feel of the piece. It is a great idea......... just not fully realized.
+2 Agreed! "Beauty is in the eye of the belolder..."Chip wrote:Perhaps whether we care for it or not is not relevent at all ...
In any piece of work like this you have a physical embodiment of the synthesis of intent and execution. My comments above reflected mainly on the execution side of the picture. For a piece to be really successful, the intent and execution have to be "in sync" to result in a synergistic whole. (That is not to say that all good work has to reflect "high touch".)Chip wrote:Heh, that kyusu cries out to be different. The artisan seemingly went to great lengths to be rather nonconforimist in the pot's extremely exagerated flatness to hyper flared handle to its gold hand painting.
Perhaps whether we care for it or not is not relevent at all ...