Tead Off wrote:
First off, show me an analysis that states zhuni has much less absorbtive character than other yixing clays. Is this something you heard on the grapevine (tea bush

) or is there some scientific test you are referring to? Absorption rates are measurable. Earthenware and stoneware are not both highly absorptive. In fact, stoneware can be quite close to porcelain in absorption %. This is fact. Earthenware is a separate category and the pots we are talking about are not earthenware.
This is why I am putting forth the question whether many people are using wrong terminology due to not really understanding what we're talking about and believing all the old wives tales about this or that. Is the absorption properties of the teapots or the particle size of the clay used that traps/stains/flavors the interior of a pot?
We all do things our own way and that's fine. My objection is the creation of agreement based on theory or idea and talk about it like they were facts. People used to believe the world was flat. So much of what we are told we make into truth without really questioning it to see if it really is so. The tea world is full of this.
I tried to make my post as subjective as possible. I hope I didn't come out as anyone with authority in this matter. It is just a piece of my mind.
As for the claim I made on the ZhuNi clay being less absorptive, I neither get that from a tea bush nor from any scientific testing. I just have spent quite an amount of time to read forums posts, and tea-related blog regarding yixing clay. And from what I've read, ZhuNi clay is good at retaining the aroma of tea is due to this factor. To me it sounds reasonable. Is it scientifically proven? No. I, however, would like to see one as well.
Marco wrote:
shigaraki wrote:
Given it has a "good" composition, the "old" liquor got trapped in the clay and got further enhancement. The next brew will release this liquor out. This is, of course, my own hypothesis.
Wouldn't this mean that the first brews will have to "spend" this liquor to the pot and therefore taste less intense?
And after time there would be an equilibrium in it.
So where does the improvement in taste come from?
So back to my question.
I will take one pot for my sencha and gyokuro.
One for oolong. - All kinds of? Or should I differ here as well?
Yellow and white tea better in a glaspot?
And pu erh is a sience that is not in my range yet
thanks
Marco
Marco, this is my own hypothesis. When tea liquor is absorbed into the clay, you just get "less" amount of liquor. The taste of tea is enhanced by the interaction between the clay mineral composition and the tea liquor.
However, the absorbed liquor would have more time interacted with the clay, so it gets enhanced further. Of course, everything will come to an equilibrium down the road, but the liquor is now much better than what you would drink out of a neutral vessel.
On the other hand, if you mixed type of tea, later down the road, the taste and aftertaste would be altered by this mixed interaction.
Do you have to do this? Not at all. However, since you have an inquisitive mind, I would say picking one good pot and experiment with the one tea one pot theory. It doesn't hurt, but the result might be interesting.
After all, tea tasting is very subjective. If you like it, then keep it. There is no single parameter that you should follow to enjoy your tea. In the end, brewing the tea itself to your liking is more important than buying a good pot.