Small teapot
4 letters marks
Single hole
Is this yixing clay?is it collectible?how old is it please
Yixing clay?
- Attachments
-
- a (9 of 10) (Small).jpg (23.79 KiB) Viewed 917 times
-
- a (7 of 10) (Small).jpg (21.39 KiB) Viewed 917 times
-
- a (10 of 10) (Small).jpg (32.51 KiB) Viewed 917 times
Re: Yixing clay?
I had a similar pot before,
I think that was Factory-2 or other factories..it had no porosity, no development on seasoning...overall quality wasn't comparable to Factory-1 teapots..an old pot though...
I don't know if it's similar or not..probably not
I think that was Factory-2 or other factories..it had no porosity, no development on seasoning...overall quality wasn't comparable to Factory-1 teapots..an old pot though...
I don't know if it's similar or not..probably not

Apr 8th, '17, 09:30
Posts: 1144
Joined: Jul 10th, '13, 01:38
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Japan.
Re: Yixing clay?
Yes, this is definitely Yixing clay.williammimi70 wrote: Is this yixing clay?is it collectible?how old is it please
With regards to the teapot's age, in my opinion this is a F2/F5 teapot from around mid/late 80s.
Re: Yixing clay?
My guess is yixing zisha, and maybe factory 1. pictures of inside the lid and inside the pot would give more clues. Nice pot though!
Re: Yixing clay?
Thank you very much.These are the pictures of the inside lid. The photos were taken in an early UK morningricegeek wrote: My guess is yixing zisha, and maybe factory 1. pictures of inside the lid and inside the pot would give more clues. Nice pot though!
- Attachments
-
- a1 (7 of 8) (Small).jpg (47.86 KiB) Viewed 859 times
-
- a1 (6 of 8) (Small).jpg (53.47 KiB) Viewed 859 times
Apr 9th, '17, 05:07
Posts: 541
Joined: Aug 19th, '15, 07:03
Location: on the road
Re: Yixing clay?
No offense meant but with all those fake pots around it really escapes me how anyone can come to a safe conclusion from a couple small jpgs without any further information.
Re: Yixing clay?
thank you very much, as a novice at this ( I collect mainly antique porcelain hence I don't know what is the requirement to enable accurate assessmentkuánglóng wrote: No offense meant but with all those fake pots around it really escapes me how anyone can come to a safe conclusion from a couple small jpgs without any further information.
Apr 9th, '17, 05:47
Posts: 1144
Joined: Jul 10th, '13, 01:38
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Japan.
Re: Yixing clay?
I confirm what I wrote earlier, this is not a F1 teapot, so probably a F2/F5 from mid/late 80s (or later); please note this teapot could even be a private production from the 90s.
Embark on this path, strictly abiding by the aforementioned advices/rules, and you too will start appreciating and understanding the authenticity of a teapot just by a jpg photo.
Studying and handling as much as possible; possibly, comparing authentic teapots and modern forgeries side by side. Perseverance, zealousness, enthusiasm, passion, and last but not least, a discerning eye, are all equally required.kuánglóng wrote: No offense meant but with all those fake pots around it really escapes me how anyone can come to a safe conclusion from a couple small jpgs without any further information.
Embark on this path, strictly abiding by the aforementioned advices/rules, and you too will start appreciating and understanding the authenticity of a teapot just by a jpg photo.
Re: Yixing clay?
Thank you very much. I guest collecting antique porcelain would be much easierWilliam wrote: I confirm what I wrote earlier, this is not a F1 teapot, so probably a F2/F5 from mid/late 80s (or later); please note this teapot could even be a private production from the 90s.
Studying and handling as much as possible; possibly, comparing authentic teapots and modern forgeries side by side. Perseverance, zealousness, enthusiasm, passion, and last but not least, a discerning eye, are all equally required.kuánglóng wrote: No offense meant but with all those fake pots around it really escapes me how anyone can come to a safe conclusion from a couple small jpgs without any further information.
Embark on this path, strictly abiding by the aforementioned advices/rules, and you too will start appreciating and understanding the authenticity of a teapot just by a jpg photo.
These are the things that I collect
- Attachments
-
- a7.jpg (32.67 KiB) Viewed 827 times
-
- a8.jpg (63.93 KiB) Viewed 827 times
-
- a9.jpg (25.48 KiB) Viewed 827 times
Re: Yixing clay?
Dear William!William wrote:Yes, this is definitely Yixing clay.williammimi70 wrote: Is this yixing clay?is it collectible?how old is it please
With regards to the teapot's age, in my opinion this is a F2/F5 teapot from around mid/late 80s.
I tried to reply to your message but could not do it . Sorry!!!!
Apr 9th, '17, 08:29
Posts: 1144
Joined: Jul 10th, '13, 01:38
Scrolling: scrolling
Location: Japan.
Re: Yixing clay?
Thanks for showing me your collection, it's a rather impressive view I must say, congratulations! 

Re: Yixing clay?
Thank youWilliam wrote: Thanks for showing me your collection, it's a rather impressive view I must say, congratulations!![]()
Re: Yixing clay?
Nice collection! Bit why would that be easier? Plenty of imitations and forgeries as well, I thought?
Re: Yixing clay?
To me it would be easier because there are very good books in English on authenticating antique Chinese porcelains that are easy to understand. when I started collecting Chinese porcelains I bought a book written by Mr Anthony Allen , it was easy to understand and easily affordable. I am looking for a book on Yixing teapots that is suitable for a complete novice like myself, any recommendation?Henk wrote: Nice collection! Bit why would that be easier? Plenty of imitations and forgeries as well, I thought?
Re: Yixing clay?
There are some chinese books on factory pots from the early era, which offer guidelines on identifying factory pots through some visual cues. Kyarazen's recent thread on the translation of one such book is a good example. Of course, it's hard to be definitive with just pictures, especially for high quality fakes, but most fakes out there are not that high quality, and can be ruled out following well establish guidelines.kuánglóng wrote: No offense meant but with all those fake pots around it really escapes me how anyone can come to a safe conclusion from a couple small jpgs without any further information.
My responses are not meant to sound definitive or authoritative. Rather, I am trying to offer my own opinion and hope that others with experience would chime in as well to confirm or dispute, all in the hope of learning more.
Back to the topic of this particular pot, hard to tell from pictures if this is factory 1. But even if it's not authentic, I think it's it's a better replica than most. Of course, whether the clay is truly good or safe depends on use, meaning no artificial smells when hit with boiling water. And perhaps I should be more clear about this, since that's the most important part, not using harmful pots for brewing.